I admit it: if the Tigers traded Rick Porcello, I’d be more than okay with it.

What? Yes, I did track the game last night and he was the Porcello we see all too infrequently. As Jason Beck writes, Saturday night’s start against the Rays was the righthander’s finest outing in 14 months. But that’s just it: should we have to wait more than a year between stellar performances from a guy in his fourth big-league season? My answer today is: no way.

After last season, with a couple of postseason starts to add to his solid work in Game 163, I thought Porcello was ready to elevate his game. “He’s still only 23,” I’d say to anyone who was down on him last year or in the offseason. But now, after watching him get hit hard in a game at Wrigley Field last month and sitting through frustrating six-innings-at-most starts, I’ve changed my tune.

I think.

I mean, he’s still only 23.

Though, as the Doug Fister situation becomes more mysterioso and alarming by the start, we can’t watch the Tigers jettison serviceable young arms can we? We can if it brings back a package including Matt Garza and Darwin Barney, or Jed Lowrie or Jose Altuve and Wandy Rodriguez.

But Porcello did have a decent outing against the Rangers last week — one run on six hits with three walks and seven strikeouts over six innings — so maybe he’s putting it together now. Yet this could be the height of his trade value and Dave Dombrowski would be wise to include him in a package. Better him that Jacob Turner, Drew Smyly or Casey Crosby. Right?

I still believe many of us Tigers fans are paralyzed with fear that the club will commit another John-Smoltz-for-Doyle-Alexander trade with one of their young arms or catching prospects. My gut tells me that wouldn’t be the case with a trade of Rick Porcello. What we’ve seen is what we’re going to get.

Or maybe not.

I mean, he’s still only 23.