<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two for Tuesday: Damon Decisions, Ordonez Operations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyfungo.com/2010/08/24/two-for-tuesday-damon-decisions-ordonez-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyfungo.com/2010/08/24/two-for-tuesday-damon-decisions-ordonez-operations/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Craddock</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfungo.com/2010/08/24/two-for-tuesday-damon-decisions-ordonez-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-78076</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Craddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=5124#comment-78076</guid>
		<description>Maggs is clearly the better choice, unless the Tigers are looking for someone to hold down that DL spot. 

I know it&#039;s not my money, but I&#039;d love to see them eat the last year of Guillen&#039;s contract and bring back both Damon and Ordonez (both at significantly less money than we paid them this year). Of course, with Boras as their agent, and the possibility that the Tigers will make a run at Crawford, that may not be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggs is clearly the better choice, unless the Tigers are looking for someone to hold down that DL spot. </p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s not my money, but I&#8217;d love to see them eat the last year of Guillen&#8217;s contract and bring back both Damon and Ordonez (both at significantly less money than we paid them this year). Of course, with Boras as their agent, and the possibility that the Tigers will make a run at Crawford, that may not be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave.t</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfungo.com/2010/08/24/two-for-tuesday-damon-decisions-ordonez-operations/comment-page-1/#comment-78075</link>
		<dc:creator>dave.t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=5124#comment-78075</guid>
		<description>Guillen or Ordonez?  no question, take Maggs.  Guillen is on his way out, Maggs still has lots left in the tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guillen or Ordonez?  no question, take Maggs.  Guillen is on his way out, Maggs still has lots left in the tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

