<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Non Sequiturs: Final Four Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyfungo.com/2009/04/04/the-non-sequiturs-final-four-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyfungo.com/2009/04/04/the-non-sequiturs-final-four-edition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfungo.com/2009/04/04/the-non-sequiturs-final-four-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-59346</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=2172#comment-59346</guid>
		<description>Im gonna have to disagree with you. I think it&#039;s ridiculous that a player&#039;s number is such a big deal, especially when it&#039;s retired. I think that no number on any club should ever be retired, I understand the Jackie Robinson thing-which should be the only exception. If you start retiring numbers there aren&#039;t going to be any numbers left to use eventually. There really aren&#039;t that many numbers-nobody really uses numbers higher than 40-50. Who would want to wear #87 just because all the low #&#039;s are taken-like 1,3,6,13,etc.I also understand the respect issue-if a player is still alive then ask their permission or their family-Sheffield asked permission and Tramm said ok. I honestly think it&#039;s stupid that a player can&#039;t wear a # he wants because it&#039;s retired or something. I don&#039;t mean to offend anybody, but every # should be available and no #&#039;s should ever be retired.When I played sports my # was 6, if I played for the Tiger&#039;s I would have been upset if someone told me I couldn&#039;t wear it-no disrespect to Kaline.If you look at it from a different p.o.v, you&#039;ll see why it&#039;s not a good idea.It&#039;s just my opinion-I wish more people agreed with me on this one because this one kind of bothers me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im gonna have to disagree with you. I think it&#8217;s ridiculous that a player&#8217;s number is such a big deal, especially when it&#8217;s retired. I think that no number on any club should ever be retired, I understand the Jackie Robinson thing-which should be the only exception. If you start retiring numbers there aren&#8217;t going to be any numbers left to use eventually. There really aren&#8217;t that many numbers-nobody really uses numbers higher than 40-50. Who would want to wear #87 just because all the low #&#8217;s are taken-like 1,3,6,13,etc.I also understand the respect issue-if a player is still alive then ask their permission or their family-Sheffield asked permission and Tramm said ok. I honestly think it&#8217;s stupid that a player can&#8217;t wear a # he wants because it&#8217;s retired or something. I don&#8217;t mean to offend anybody, but every # should be available and no #&#8217;s should ever be retired.When I played sports my # was 6, if I played for the Tiger&#8217;s I would have been upset if someone told me I couldn&#8217;t wear it-no disrespect to Kaline.If you look at it from a different p.o.v, you&#8217;ll see why it&#8217;s not a good idea.It&#8217;s just my opinion-I wish more people agreed with me on this one because this one kind of bothers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

