Comments on: A Smoltz Return? http://www.dailyfungo.com/2008/12/10/a-smoltz-return/ Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mike McClary http://www.dailyfungo.com/2008/12/10/a-smoltz-return/comment-page-1/#comment-56392 Mike McClary Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:45:44 +0000 http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=1725#comment-56392 Ha! You're right on that -- I meant two score, er, <em>one</em> score. Guess I should've gone with "21 years ago." - Mike Ha! You’re right on that — I meant two score, er, one score. Guess I should’ve gone with “21 years ago.”

- Mike

]]> By: rea http://www.dailyfungo.com/2008/12/10/a-smoltz-return/comment-page-1/#comment-56387 rea Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:11:50 +0000 http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=1725#comment-56387 <i>three score after he was traded</i> Come on! I'm getting old, but I <i>know</i> 1987 wasn't three score (60) years ago! three score after he was traded

Come on! I’m getting old, but I know 1987 wasn’t three score (60) years ago!

]]> By: Doug http://www.dailyfungo.com/2008/12/10/a-smoltz-return/comment-page-1/#comment-56376 Doug Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:10:41 +0000 http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=1725#comment-56376 If he can still throw, there's no harm in pursuing. If he can still throw, there’s no harm in pursuing.

]]> By: justin in gr http://www.dailyfungo.com/2008/12/10/a-smoltz-return/comment-page-1/#comment-56374 justin in gr Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:42:23 +0000 http://www.dailyfungo.com/?p=1725#comment-56374 YES! OH MY GOD! GET HIM! I would be so happy! YES! OH MY GOD! GET HIM! I would be so happy!

]]>